2010 Honda VFR1200F
In this computerized day and age where smart phones rule and seemingly everyone has a computer close to hand, we tend to take motorcycle technology for granted. Indeed, our attitude towards the launch of a new motorcycle can become a little blasé, ho hum even.
Honda's new 2010 VFR1200F probably won't get that reaction. To start with, the new VFR1200 demands attention simply because of its futuristic styling. Some people will love it, others not so much. For me, I didn't love the looks--until I saw it in person. In pictures the front fairing and large headlight seem to dominate the machine, but in the cold light of day the Honda VFR1200 actually looks balanced, modern, and close inspection reveals a super-high quality sports machine. If this was a car--think Acura.
The 2010 Honda VFR1200F is a traditional machine in many ways--although it's such a quantum leap over the current VFR800 they share almost nothing in common. The VFR1200F is now equipped with radial ABS brakes (which work well), male-slider forks with rebound damping adjustment, a 1200cc V-four engine that produces incredibly useful--and user-friendly--amounts of torque from idle through to the 10,200 RPM rev-limiter; and a shaft-drive that is smooth and completely undetectable from the saddle. These things alone make new 2010 Honda VFR1200F not just a generational shift over the previous model, it's more like two generations beyond--and almost a different species.
So the new Honda VFR1200F will delight the traditionalist who likes his sport bike to have comfortable ergonomics and yet be able to handle a fast, twisty road when called upon? Absolutely. Heck, this bike was more than capable of handling the highly technical Sugo racetrack in Japan with aplomb; make no mistake, this is not a sport-tourer; it's a true sport bike that's comfortable enough to go big distances, and with a passenger as well if you want it to. It's not quite as committed as the CBR models, and apparently tipping the scales at a shade over 600 lbs (wet), it naturally doesn't feel as supremely light and flickable, but the Honda VFR's weight is well centralized, and the rider comfortably sits ‘in' the bike, so it turns quickly, securely, and goes exactly where it's pointed--and that was with stock suspension settings at the track. The Honda VFR's single sided swing-arm is now equipped with shaft drive, although at no point on the track was I ever reminded of that; torque reaction was happily absent as I came on the throttle at corner exit.
Although the Honda VFR1200 has many traditional aspects to it, there are several sophisticated elements to the new Honda. Firstly, the new ride-by-wire fueling is exemplary, with excellent throttle connection and zero flat spots. Around Sugo's several tight corners, the throttle could be finessed into providing exactly the amount of power I needed--no more, no less--and without any hesitation or lurch either. The final chicane on to Sugo's straight is diabolically slow and involves a right, long left, then right that feels so like walking pace it requires untold patience from the rider. Yet the well-balanced 2010 VFR1200 handled the flip-flopping transition with ease. After several initial laps I realized that with the astonishing torque output of the engine I could carry second gear instead of first through this chicane, and despite the engine slowing to idle at one point the precision fueling and smooth torque output pulled the VFR1200F like a train through the exit and up the hill. Impressive stuff indeed.
But the smartest part of the Honda VFR1200F is without a doubt the new transmission. Dyed-in-the-wool traditionalists can stop reading here as you won't be interested in this next bit. I can already hear you telling me how you "need to be in control" and how "automatic or clutchless trannys are a gimmick that no real motorcyclist wants". Actually, I confess I was one of those guys--and you'll note the past tense. My attitude wasn't helped by Yamaha's recent automatic clutch on their FJR, which was for me, the answer to a question no-one had asked. The gearbox was not automatic, so merely removing the manual clutch operation not only didn't add anything to my riding experience; it unfortunately took away some control at slow speed.
The 2010 Honda VFR1200F has no such issues. At slow speed the clutch engages quickly and there's plenty of ‘feel'. Walking pace speed in the parking lot was handled without problem, and the bike reacted intuitively without the Yamaha's sudden loss of drive that required a panicky foot-stab to stay upright. Whether this is down to superior electronic wizardry or the 2010 Honda VFR's new dual-clutch transmission will need further investigation, but for this initial riding impression I can testify that it truly works. The new DCT (Dual Clutch Transmission) essentially divides the gearbox into two--odd and even gear ratios--so that at all times the ‘next' gear is already selected. When that gear is needed, the switch from one to the other is accomplished so quickly (less than half a second) and so smoothly that the process is almost transparent to the rider. This is the same type of system used on the new BMW M3, and I believe also the Lamborghini Gallardo, Mitsubishi EVO and other hyper-sport cars. It's Formula 1 derived technology and it simply makes a mockery of the old way of automatic transmission. Don't even think of comparing it to the CVT (Constantly Variable Transmission) that you typically find on scooters and Honda's DN-01. No, this is precise gear selection where the perfect ratio is used at all times, and engine braking is exactly the same as on a manual gearbox.
Drive is selected by using the ‘D' button on the right handlebar. This mode was essentially useless around Sugo as the VFR chooses the tallest possible gears for optimum fuel economy and rider/passenger comfort. On the road I believe it'll work just fine, but for hard-core sport riding around a high-speed track, pushing the button twice selects ‘S' (Sport) mode--and that was what was needed at Sugo. Paddle-switch type shifters on the left handlebar switchgear (thumb for going down the ‘box, forefinger for going up the ‘box) shift gears manually, and the process worked impeccably. If you like, you can ride the bike in nothing but manual shift mode (whichever mode you use, the digital gear indicator will always tell you the gear number) and you simply ride like normal, shifting up and down whenever you deem appropriate. The Honda VFR1200 will hold the selected gear unless you come to a complete stop. Manual mode simply takes away having to use your left foot to click a lever, and of course you don't have a clutch lever to worry about either.
But it's the automatic Sport mode that's so mind-bogglingly impressive. The Honda engineers have somehow built an automatic shifting gearbox that is so smart it always had the correct gear selected. This is an astonishing accomplishment--a technical racetrack like Sugo holds several places that could easily trip up the system. And yet, the Honda always had the right gear, at the right time. I actually reached a point where I gave up looking at the gear I was in, or even thinking about shifting; I simply rode the bike and focused on brake markers, turn-in points and exit speeds. It was an astounding display from the VFR and as mentioned earlier, it made a convert out of me.
Prices have yet to be announced, but I think we can expect a motorcycle of the quality of the VFR to be up there around the $16,000 mark. The automatic gearbox version will probably cost around $2,000 more, so for a fully loaded 2010 Honda VFR1200F with all the touring accessories (and there are lots of those available) you can probably expect prices closer to BMW's K-series machines. But such is the quality of build and high-tech brilliance, the Honda will hold its own, I'm confident. Honda reps are cagey about how many VFRs will hit the USA, but expect the auto version to be a very limited edition until they can get a feel for demand in the marketplace.
2010 Honda VFR1200F First Review Conclusion
From what I sampled in Japan, Honda has truly worked its magic, and for the first time in over 30 years of riding I can honestly admit that I would now buy a sports motorcycle equipped with an automatic transmission. The new 2010 VFR1200F DCT is just light-years better than anything we've had up until now.







Comments
I have to say you made this new machine come to life for me. This is what all reviews should be... An education, a chance for us consumers to experience the bike before the purchase. Great review and I love the new site here.
Seems like Honda has done it again. Can't wait to ride this bike. Might even go for the auto, seems like it would be an interesting change.
Just subscribed to your print magazine as I bought it recently at b&n. I like what umc is doing online as well. Keep it coming. Jon
I'm really liking everything about the new VFR1200...EXCEPT the possibly sky high pricing...Honda needs to have the bike come in around the price of the FJR and C14, especially since it appears they will NOT have the saddlebags, centerstand or heated grips standard (the C14 does...)! If it's priced around 16 grand without options above as this author suggests, that would kill the deal for me, sadly. More realistic plain-bike pricing hopefully will come in around $13,500 without options...and under 15000 with bags, centerstand and heated grips...
V4 motors are expensive, in general, to build. Sounds like good value based on what you get. The new transmission is cool but not sure it will sell. Not to be too blunt but who needs an automatic? This is by no means a beginners bike.
V4 motors are expensive, in general, to build. Sounds like good value based on what you get. The new transmission is cool but not sure it will sell. Not to be too blunt but who needs an automatic? This is by no means a beginners bike.
I have always been one of those "Little Bit Country and Little Bit Rock n Roll" sorta guys when it comes to being a traditionalist but also remaining open to trying out the new. So when it came time to change my sport sedan I did my usual extensive researching (and struggling) before finally settling on my choice. You may ask, what does making decisions about a sport sedan have to do with deciding on a motorcycle? For myself, at least, I found the following experience instructive generally plus it has opened up my eyes to considering alternative views for my motorcycle choices, too!
So now I've gone from one of the German makes to the Infiniti G37x with the 7 speed auto that includes a quite respectably-programmed ("smart") sport setting as well as manual "like" gear selection capability. While not quite perfect as I do find it misses the best choice although VERY infrequently, from what a purist but most importantly, accomplished manual driver would likely choose - no question the convenience factor really can't be overlooked. I must also admit that, while shifting (especially after decades of sport driving and riding experience) had always felt as "automatic" a bit like breathing, could ever be...there's no question I am finding one less little bit of detail to concern myself with. Better yet, I find that tiny difference of reduced "mental load" to pay attention to, makes for even greater enjoyment driving (which really surprised me!); even enabling my tossing the vehicle more aggressively than I might otherwise, for example and all the while, being able to give just a bit more attention to the feel of the machine seemingly blending with the road in a manner that at least seems more "artful." I will say the "G's" I am experiencing sure FEEL to me to prove this point (no pun intended).
There's even an obvious safety increase regarding my improved attention capacity outside, where it should be!
Now with all THAT (whole lotta stuff said, sorry!), I must also add, that having torn not one but three of four ligaments quite badly in one knee skiing a year ago, my now expanded "Check List" for how I "Decision Filter" certain of my buying choices and features, also found itself playing into the mix. You could say that while the skiing accident was definitely a "combination of flukes" resulting in my tearing up my knee, it did provide me one additional perspective helping me be more open to alternative shifting means. Put simply, flukes happen and my Boy Scout side figures, preparation is good! After all, life is about risk and our doing our best to plan and execute in a manner helping mitigate those risks.
...a great automatic with excellent sport shift mode and ability to override by the user, can easily be argued as a nice step helping this (risk mitigation) while improving the experience for those open to it!
Finally, like everyone, Honda makes mistakes but not very many so on balance, I know where I'm placing my bet on this wager by Honda.
Thanks for the kind words guys (those of you who made them!). As I said, the bike was genuinely impressive. Naturally, every journalist there agreed with the concerns you mention: price, and do we really need an automatic?
Needless to say the good folks at American Honda are concerned about the final retail number too... but they have to follow the European pricing and aren't allowed to make the bike cheaper here. Obviously you'll have to judge for yourselves, but at least the bike is beautifully manufactured and fully competitive quality-wise with any premium brand--hence my 'Acura' comment.
The auto gearbox will for sure have its critics... 'superfluous'; 'unnecessary'; 'overkill' etc. If you fall into that camp, hey, you'll save a couple of grand and get a superb, traditional bike. But again, it was interesting to see the assembled journos reactions as we all came in from the track sessions. One (usually very skeptical, understated guy) exclaimed in disbelief "this thing's smarter than I am!" Once the various jokes had subsided we all pretty much agreed that the auto function (on this short test) seemed to be almost impossible to trip up. After a few laps monitoring what the gearing was doing I just gave up and focused on riding the track with the right lines and brake points etc. The VFR simply took gearing out of the equation, which for me, was an astounding achievement given my usual (pretty vocal!) skepticism on this kind of 'aid'. I'm an old-school guy and prefer to keep it that way, but I'm reluctantly admitting that this bike has at the very least, now got me confused. Truth is, if they were equal price--I'd buy the auto, without a doubt.
We live in interesting times!
Appreciate you all reading and commenting--thanks.
I believe that this will be the way all motorcycles will be in 10 years. You can have your ride any way you want to. I'm tired to the point of nauseum re: what is a motorcycle. It a two or three wheeled motorized conveyance, having the limited ability to carry up to 2 people. That's about it. The argument about scooters vs MC's is stupid. My Burgman 650 shifts like the FJR, or it can drive automatic like the new VFR, by using a computerized CVT, with an integrated shaft drive. It will do 115 mph which is all it needs to do. or I need it to do. I can take it to the track too, albeit a slower but no less thrilling experience. What it does better than any MC is to carry an enormous amount of cargo. Let Suzuki come out with a Burgman that has the tank up front, a naked rear, and still maintain the cargo capacity and I will guarantee that traditional MC sales will fall off to nothing, bought only by the dinosaurs out there who want to ride like the "old timers" did.
I guess you have NEVER been on a Suzuki Burgman, eh?... LoL....this is something we've HAD for almost a decade. I love my 2006 Burgman 650 and it too, always seem to have the right gear for the throttle setting...